Showing posts with label uk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label uk. Show all posts

9:43 AM

(0) Comments

British Prosecutors Deny Litvinenko Charges Were Blocked

lafrance

,


Aleksandr Litvinenko

Aleksandr Litvinenko days before his November 2006 death of radiation poisoning
(epa)
May 20, 2007 -- The British prosecutors' office denies that Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett prevented them from charging two Russians in the killing of Aleksandr Litvinenko for fear of upsetting the Kremlin, as a British daily reported.

Ken MacDonald, the director of public prosecutions in England, said the report about Beckett is "completely untrue."

Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitry Kovtun are key suspects in the murder of Litvinenko, the former Federal Security Service officer who died in November of radiation contamination.


Lugovoi and Kovtun are former KGB agents who had tea with Litvinenko in London on the day he was poisoned. Both are in Moscow.



Copyright (c) 2007. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036. www.rferl.org and http://dndtalk.com/Joomla,dndtalk.ca


12:27 PM

(0) Comments

Four young lives snuffed out in the hell that is Iraq

lafrance

,



Four young lives snuffed out in the hell that is Iraq

(lgray@scotsman.com)


four lives lost


IT IS the wasted potential that stands out. A 19-year-old still to complete her A-levels. An Oxford graduate already singled out for promotion despite her youth. A committed family man with two small boys, and a 19-year-old man remembered for always having a "smile on his face and a sparkle in his big blue eyes".


The army spoke of the loyalty of its four personnel, but their ages and life stories reveal the talent, youth and promise that Britain has lost.






Private Eleanor Dlugosz, Lieutenant Jo Dyer, Corporal Kris O'Neill and Kingsman Adam Smith, were in a Warrior armoured vehicle returning from patrol near Basra in southern Iraq when insurgents struck on Thursday.


Lt Dyer had become a friend of Prince William while at Sandhurst and last night Clarence House said the prince was "deeply saddened to hear the tragic news of Joanna Dyer's death. Jo was a close friend of his at Sandhurst and he is very much thinking of her family and friends and they will remain in his thoughts and prayers."


British officials have accused Iran's Revolutionary Guards of supplying the sophisticated "shaped" projectiles used by Iraqi insurgents in a series of deadly roadside bomb attacks.


Eleanor Dlugosz


Private Dlugosz, at the age of 19, is the youngest woman to have died in the war so far. The teenager, from Southampton, first arrived in Iraq in November as part of the Royal Army Medical Corps before returning to the UK in January to take a Class 1 medics course. Having completed the course, she returned to Iraq last month to provide medical support to troops on patrol in Basra for the first time.


Known as "Ella" to some and "DZ" to everyone else, she was described by her colleagues as a "strong, bright and capable" woman. She had aspirations to complete her A-levels and train as a laboratory technician when she returned to the UK.


Her troop commander, 2nd Lieutenant Vinny Ramshaw, said: "Pte Dlugosz was a strong and morally courageous young woman, who was an example to many older and more experienced soldiers."


Her commanding officer, Lieutenant Colonel Martin Toney, said: "DZ was one of those soldiers who, despite a degree of shyness and a natural reticence, always surprised with her guts and determination."


Jo Dyer


Lieutenant Dyer, 24, from Yeovil, was the second woman to be killed in the attack, bringing the total number of servicewomen to die in action in Iraq since the 2003 invasion to four; a fifth woman's death is thought to have been non-combat related.


An Oxford graduate, Lt Dyer was commissioned into the intelligence corps at the end of last year and had already been given a post beyond her rank. She was attached to the Duke of Lancaster's Regiment to gain operational experience in Iraq. As an "enthusiastic and charming officer", she had been promoted to the battalion's ISTAR officer, an important intelligence gathering position normally reserved for more experienced personnel.


Friends and colleagues said: "To those who she lived with, she will be remembered as the girl who could light up a room."


Kris O'Neill


Corporal Kris O'Neill, 27, from Catterick, Yorkshire, was the father of two small boys. He returned to Iraq at the beginning of this year after recovering from a knee injury. An experienced and "unflappable" medic with the Royal Army Medical Corps, he everything they needed.


He became a father figure to the soldiers for whom he was responsible and was recently tasked with teaching first aid to the Iraqi police service.


The MoD said he was: "A committed family man with two small boys, those who knew him were always struck by his kind and gentle nature."


His squadron commander, Major Phil Carter, said: "I could always depend on Cpl O'Neill. Whatever he was doing, he would give it 110 per cent and make sure it was right. He was dedicated to ensuring that the soldiers we support receive the best possible medical care."


Adam Smith


Only 19, Kingsman Smith, from Liverpool, had already earned the respect of his colleagues in the Duke of Lancaster's Regiment. Known for his happy-go-lucky attitude, the Everton fan was also a dependable member of the reconnaissance platoon.


Colour Sergeant Skelton, of the reconnaissance platoon, said: " [He] was such a big character, always had a smile on his face and a sparkle in his big blue eyes."


Kingsman Bird , of the Reconnaissance Platoon, added: "He died doing the job he loved and was good at. I will never forget him."


Last night, the family of Kgn Smith, known as Smudge, paid a moving tribute to him.


It read: "This was the hardest thing we have ever had to do, it just doesn't seem real and no amount of words can describe how much we are hurting.


"Adam was the most wonderful and beautiful person anyone could wish to meet. He always had a smile on his face and loved life so much - he had everything to live for.


"He was a loving son, brother and the best boyfriend in the whole world, and he will be missed more than words can say. He will forever be in our hearts. Adam, our hero, our star."


A Kuwaiti interpreter was also killed and a fifth soldier was seriously injured in the blast, which left a 3ft deep crater in the road.


The total number of British deaths in Iraq since the 2003 invasion now stands at 140.


Last night politicians said the deaths highlighted the need to bring British troops home from Iraq.


SNP defence spokesman Angus Robertson said: "The deaths of these young people is a tragedy and our hearts go out to their families."


Describing the war as "illegal and unecessary", he said: "What we need now is an exit strategy to bring the troops home to prevent any more lives being lost and families destroyed."


Police chief says bomb may be Iranian but Blair stops short of accusation


AN IRAQI police commander said the type of roadside bomb used in the attack that killed the four British soldiers on Thursday had not been seen in the region previously, and could be Iranian-designed.


Basra police chief Mohammed al-Moussawi's description of the deadly explosive penetrator hinted it might be from Iran.


The news comes after Prime Minister Tony Blair accused elements in the Iranian regime of supporting terrorism in Iraq.


Two more of the bombs were discovered planted along routes heavily travelled by US and British diplomats in Basra. Weeks earlier, the US military had claimed Iran was supplying Shiite militia fighters in Iraq with the powerful weapons, known as EFPs. They are capable of piercing armoured vehicles.


Mr al-Moussawi said two similar bombs had been discovered yesterday morning, one on the road leading to Basra Palace, the compound that houses a British base and UK and US consulates, another in the western Hayaniyah district where Thursday's attack occurred - a stronghold of the Mahdi Army, a militia loyal to radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.


The reported deaths of the American forces and the bomb attack on the British unit marked the start of the eighth week of the joint US-Iraqi security crackdown in Baghdad and surrounding territory.


Tony Blair called the Basra attack an "act of terrorism" and suggested it may have been the work of militiamen linked to Iran. He stopped short of accusing Tehran, however.


"Now, it is far too early to say that the particular terrorist act that killed our forces was an act committed by terrorists backed by any elements of the Iranian regime, so I make no allegation in respect of that particular incident," Mr Blair said. He added, however: "This is maybe the right moment to reflect on our relationship with Iran."


Meanwhile, on Thursday, a suicide bomber driving a truck loaded with TNT and toxic chlorine gas crashed into a police checkpoint in Iraq, killing at least 27 people and wounding dozens, police in Ramadi said.


The bombing in Anbar province marked the ninth use of suicide chlorine bombs in the sprawling, mainly desert territory that has been a strong-hold of the Sunni insurgency.


Recently, however, many Anbar tribes have switched allegiance, with large numbers of military-age men joining the police and Iraqi army in a bid to expel al-Qaeda in Iraq fighters.


Some bystanders had trouble breathing after yesterday's chlorine attack and were taken to a Ramadi hospital for treatment, said a police spokesman. Most were discharged after about 30 minutes, he added.


Others with more serious injuries were taken to a US base in the area, and then flown by helicopter to a larger hospital north of Baghdad, he said.


Police opened fire as the suicide car-bomber sped toward a checkpoint, three miles west of the city, according to police. Nearby buildings were damaged and police were searching the rubble for more victims.


South of Baghdad, Iraqi forces backed by US paratroopers swept into a troubled, predominantly Shiite city before dawn, and the American military said as many as six militia fighters had been killed. Eight others were wounded and five detained.


ANGUS HOWARTH



News Source Provided by scotsman.com


12:11 PM

(0) Comments

Captives 'thought throats were being cut'

lafrance

,


Captives 'thought throats were being cut'


STEPHEN MCGINTY

THE Iranian soldiers had changed out of military uniforms and were now dressed all in black, their faces masked. For the 14 male hostages, the worst moment of their ordeal had arrived. The belief that they were being taken to the British Embassy in Tehran for imminent release had evaporated. Instead, at a detention centre, blindfolded and with their hands secured with plastic cuffs, they were all made to face a brick wall.


Then guns were cocked and a British captive cried out: "Lads, lads. I think we are going to be executed." At that point, one of the hostages vomited: at least one of the others thought someone had just had their throat cut, and that it was blood hitting the floor.






The full extent of the psychological pressure the 15 British personnel were put under by their Iranian captors was revealed yesterday at a press conference at the Royal Marines' base at Chivenor, Devon.


Joe Tindell, 21, a Royal Marine from London, said: "On day two, the mood completely changed. They changed from the military dress to all black, their faces covered. We thought we were going to the British Embassy but we got taken to a detention centre, all 15 of us. We had a blindfold and plastic cuffs, hands behind our backs, heads against the wall.


"Basically there were weapons cocking. Someone - I'm not sure who - someone said, I quote, 'Lads, lads. I think we're going to get executed'. After that comment, someone was sick and as far as I was concerned he had just had his throat cut. From there, we were rushed to a room, quick photo, and then stuffed into a cell and didn't see or speak to anyone for six days."


Yesterday, sitting under a giant Union flag in the base's gym hall, the marines and Royal Navy sailors said they had been under "constant psychological pressure" and threatened with seven years in prison if they did not admit they had strayed into Iranian waters.


In a written statement, read by Lieutenant Felix Carman, 26, and Royal Marine Captain Chris Air, 25, the group defended their conduct while in captivity and said they had not apologised for being in Iranian waters - in fact, they had been 1.7 nautical miles from Iranian waters.


In a direct rebuttal of criticisms that they had not fought back against the Iranian forces, Capt Airs said: "From the outset, it was very apparent that fighting back was simply not an option. Had we chosen to do so, then many of us would not be standing here today. Of that I have no doubts."


The group said Leading Seaman Faye Turney, who appeared in several Iranian videos and wrote letters for the authorities, had been detained separately and been told that everyone else had been sent home.


The crew's ordeal began on Friday, March 23, while they were on a routine operation. They had boarded a merchant vessel south of the Shatt al-Arab waterway when two speedboats were spotted approaching rapidly from about 400 metres away.


Capt Air said: "I ordered everyone to make their weapons ready and ordered the boarding party to return to the boats. By the time all were back on board, two Iranian boats had come alongside. One officer spoke good English and I explained that we were conducting a routine operation, as allowed under a UN mandate. But when we tried to leave, they prevented us by blocking us in.


"Some of the Iranian sailors were becoming deliberately aggressive and unstable. They rammed our boat and trained their heavy machineguns, RPGs [rocket-propelled grenades] and weapons on us. Another six boats were closing in on us. We realised that our efforts to reason with these people were not making any headway."


Lt Carman told how they were taken into custody, stripped of their kit and blindfolded. On that first night, they were subjected to random questioning.


The next day, they were flown to Tehran and taken to a prison where they were kept in isolation in 8ft by 6ft stone cells and interrogated most nights. It was only in the last few nights that they were allowed to gather together for a few hours, in the full glare of the Iranian media.


Lt Carman added: "On day 12, we were taken to a governmental complex, blindfolded and then given three-piece suits to wear. We watched the president's statement live on TV, and it was only then we realised we were to be sent home. We were made to line up to meet the president, one at a time. My advice to everyone was not to mess this up now - we all wanted to get home."



News Source Provided by scotsman.com

Copyright (c) 2007. http://dndtalk.com/Joomla,dndtalk.ca


12:43 PM

(0) Comments

British Service Personnel Describe Ordeal

lafrance

,


British service personnel at press conference today

British service personnel at press conference today
(TV screen shot)
April 6, 2007 -- The British navy personnel recently released by Iran have said categorically that they were not in Iranian waters when they were captured on March 23.

Speaking at a news conference at Royal Marine Base Chivenor in Devon, England, British Navy Lieutenant Felix Carman described their treatment at the hands of the Iranian authorities.

"Throughout our ordeal we faced constant psychological pressure. Later, we were stripped and then dressed in pajamas," Carman said. "The next few nights we spent in stone cells, approximately eight feet by six (2.4 by 1.8 meters), sleeping on piles of blankets. All of us were kept in isolation," Carman added.


In a joint statement, the group said they were threatened with up to seven years in jail by their captors if they did not admit to entering Iranian territorial waters.


"We were interrogated most nights and given two options," the group said in a statement. "If we admitted that we had strayed, we would be back on a plane to the UK pretty soon. If we didn't, we faced up to seven years in prison," the statement continued.


Psychological Pressure


Pressure put upon them included keeping them blindfolded when they were taken from one point to another, with soldiers with cocked weapons always accompanying them, making it uncertain what was their destination or their fate. Later in their captivity they were taken out in the evening, and permitted to spend some hours together.


After their arrest in the Gulf, the service personnel were taken to a prison in Tehran. "We were blindfolded, our hands were bound, we were forced up against a wall," they said in their statement, adding that they suffered "constant psychological pressure."


The 15-member team of sailors and marines were arrested on March 23 while carrying out a UN-mandated inspection of shipping in the Gulf to control against smuggling. They said they were in no position to resist arrest as they checked a freighter.


The crewmembers, in two rubber boats and lightly armed, were surrounded by speedboats of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Navy. The British naval crew said the Iranian boats came with clear intention to use force if necessary and were heavily armed.


The British crew said their detention had been "clearly illegal" and they described the entire incident as a "media stunt" staged by the Iranian authorities.


Propaganda Tool


None of the crewmembers today directly acknowledged they had admitted to trespass, despite statements televised on Iranian television in which they appeared to do so.


They said that they were careful to respond to Iranian demands they apologize by using formula like: “to the best of our knowledge,” or “from the information presented to us by Iranians,” or we “appear” to have entered into Iranian waters and “regret” that. That leaves open question of whether the statements were edited before broadcast.


They especially condemned the treatment accorded to the only woman in the group, Faye Turney, saying she was kept in special isolation and used as a "propaganda tool." The group said they were "incredibly proud" of Turney and the "highly professional" way she conducted herself throughout their 13-day detention.


"The fact that she's a woman has been used as a propaganda tool by Iran. This is deeply regrettable," the group said in their statement. Turney was not present at the press conference.


The sailors and marines were released in Tehran on April 5 after a 13-day diplomatic stand off between Tehran and London.


(compiled from agency reports)


Copyright (c) 2007. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036. www.rferl.org and http://dndtalk.com/Joomla,dndtalk.ca


9:48 AM

(0) Comments

Iran/U.K.: Expert Discusses Sailors' Apparent Cooperation With Authorities

lafrance

,


The Britons have appeared relaxed in televised images

The Britons have appeared relaxed in televised images
(epa)
April 2, 2007 (RFE/RL) -- Iran's state-run media say all 15 British naval personnel and marines being held by Tehran have confessed to illegally entering Iranian waters. Previously, Iranian television showed four of the Britons saying they had entered Iranian territory without permission when they were detained on March 23. RFE/RL correspondent Eugen Tomiuc asked Charles Heyman of the London-based Jane's Information Group if military personnel are supposed to follow certain protocol when they are detained by foreign authorities.


RFE/RL: This is the second time in recent years that U.K. personnel have been detained by Iran. Is this case different from the incident in 2004, when eight British servicemen were seized after allegedly straying over the maritime border?


Charles Heyman: No, I don't think it's any different this time. There is a dispute over where the border actually runs. The British say the border runs along one line, the Iranians say the border runs along another line. It's possible that both sides think they are in the right, and both sides firmly believe that what they are saying is correct. I mean, it really does need some international arbitration to actually, at long last, delineate exactly where this border runs.


RFE/RL: What rules must the naval personnel follow in a situation like this?


Heyman: This is a very, very difficult one for these naval personnel. They are not prisoners of war. When you are given resistance-to-interrogation training, it really is [intended] for prisoners of war. These sailors have been taken, basically, in a civil dispute, a case that normally goes before normal courts. They've been arrested, as opposed to having been captured. And one of the problems here is that if you adopt the stance that you normally do when you're a prisoner of war -- number, rank, and name -- in some legal codes, and of course in the Iranian code specifically, the inability of the person who's been detained to explain why they were there and what they were doing is, in fact, an offense in itself -- an admission of guilt. So these people are in a very difficult position. They also haven't got any access to British consulate officials. But they're not prisoners of war. They've just been arrested. So their status is very, very different, and it must be very, very confusing for them.
"I think that if we play this one correctly, our people will come back and it will be recognized for what it is -- a relatively minor territorial incident." -- Heyman




RFE/RL: Since those captured are military personnel, one would have expected them to talk with more reluctance than what we've seen on television. What kind of training do navy personnel have to help them in the event they are captured?



Heyman: I think that all the training is for capture by an enemy force. None of the training goes into being detained. They're not captured. They're being detained or arrested in a civil dispute. And there's no doubt whatsoever -- nobody can deny this -- that those sailors and marines are being treated humanely and decently by the looks of things, by the Iranians. And that's why they're smiling and they're relaxed. They know that this is a civil case, as opposed to being prisoners of war. It's a very, very difficult area. You know, you can play very easily with the public-relations aspect of it. You can get them in unguarded moments and take images of them when they are smiling. They're not going to be sitting around scowling 24 hours a day. That's not how you keep your morale up.



RFE/RL: What does this do for the image of the British military in general?



Heyman: It has come at a very sensitive moment. I think that most people worldwide understand the realities of a situation like this. These people -- the sailors and the marines -- are in a very difficult position. They weren't really equipped for war fighting. They weren't equipped to properly defend themselves. They only had small arms, while the boats that surrounded them had heavy machine guns and much heavier weapons.



RFE/RL: And on top of everything, Britain is not at war with Iran.



Heyman: Britain's not at war. Who would it have helped if there would have been a gun battle in the straits between the Royal Navy -- basically in a small rubber boat -- and the Iranian Republican Guard? It wouldn't have helped anyone. It would have sparked off something that would have given maybe some very warlike people in the world -- some people who really want to have a war in that area -- an excuse for going to war. So I think that certainly, the fact that those sailors and marines just went quietly with the Iranians was a good thing, at the end of the day. And I think that if we play this one correctly, our people will come back and it will be recognized for what it is -- a relatively minor territorial incident. They go on all the time. If you really wanted to get belligerent, there are enough ships and submarines, cruise missiles, aircraft -- things like that -- in the area to cause significant damage. But nobody wants that.

Part 2


Iran/U.K.: London, Tehran Clash In War Of Images


April 2, 2007 (RFE/RL) -- London says the 15 British sailors and marines captured on March 23 were unlawfully seized in Iraqi waters, while Tehran says they trespassed into Iranian territory.




Both sides are producing evidence: Britain with satellite maps, Iran with the "confessions" of the sailors themselves.



The dispute over just where the British sailors were at the time of their capture will probably never be resolved to everyone's satisfaction, because they were captured offshore of a region of the Iraqi-Iranian border where the demarcation line itself is subject to much disagreement.



That region is the Shatt Al-Arab waterway, a narrow channel where the Tigris and Euphrates rivers jointly flow into the Persian Gulf. The Shatt Al-Arab -- and the sea boundary offshore -- has long been used as a bargaining chip between Iran and Iraq and even as a cause of war.



Disputed Line




In 1980, then-Iraqi President Saddam Hussein dramatically ripped up on television a 1975 treaty establishing the middle of the river as the frontier. Iraq and Iran then fought an eight-year war that never ended in a peace treaty.



Still, international maritime authorities widely accept the 1975 treaty as still standing and have drawn an imaginary line out to sea from the midpoint of the channel to serve as a sea boundary until the issue is one day decided.
"The action by Iranian forces in arresting and detaining our people is unjustified and wrong. As such it is a matter of deep concern to us."




Britain argues that its sailors and marines from the British frigate "HMS Cornwall" were seized well to the west -- that is, the Iraqi side -- of this line.



"My primary message is clear: 'HMS Cornwall' with her boarding party was about her legal business, in Iraqi territorial waters, under a United Nations Security Council resolution and with the explicit approval of the Iraqi government," Royal Navy Vice Admiral Charles Style, deputy chief of the British defense staff, told reporters on March 28 in London.



"The action by Iranian forces in arresting and detaining our people is unjustified and wrong. As such it is a matter of deep concern to us," Style added.



Disputed Position



The 15 British naval personnel were seized after they left the "HMS Cornwall" aboard rubber patrol boats to conduct a routine antismuggling check on a commercial freighter. One of the rubber boats had a Global Positioning System (GPS) plotter aboard that communicated the two boats' positions to the "HMS Cornwall" at all times.



But Iran argues that the plotter on the seized boat registered a different location than the one presented by Britain. That has prompted a back-and-forth argument.



When Iran presented the first location it claims the plotter showed, London informed Tehran that this location was also in waters widely accepted to be Iraqi.



Tehran then provided what it called a "corrected" rereading of the rubber boat's location plotter. It then claimed the rubber boat was actually at a second location 1 nautical mile (1.9 kilometers) from the first Iranian-given position and thus clearly in Iranian waters.



Public-Relations Battle



As the two countries publicly exchange evidence based on high-tech locators whose functions most people poorly understand, they also are waging a hearts-and-minds battle based on what the sailors themselves say.



Britain has protested Iran's broadcasting of the video as violationg the Geneva Conventions (Fars)Tehran is relying heavily in this propaganda war on what it says are voluntary confessions that the captives trespassed into Iranian territory.



"Yes, I'd like to say to the Iranian people I can understand why you are so angry about our intrusion into your waters," British Lieutenant Felix Carmen said in video aired on April 1 on Iranian state television.



Two other Britons have also appeared on television. In addition to expressing regret for what they say is trespass, they have also praised their captors for treating them well.



"Obviously we trespassed into their waters," Faye Turney, the only woman crew member, said in a video aired on March 28. "They were very friendly, very hospitable, very thoughtful, nice people. They explained to us why we'd been arrested. There was no aggression, no hurt, no harm. They were very, very compassionate."



Style Vs. Substance



All this takes the propaganda war to a level where arguments citing satellite data from the cold world of machines confronts the emotional, human testimony of the captives themselves.



Iran has sought to direct the argument primarily to listeners in the Arab world, particularly in Iraq. It has done so by first airing the British captives' remarks on its Arabic-language foreign broadcasting channels, particularly Al-Alam television.



Britain has countered in this battle of emotions by saying Iran is abusing the captives by parading them on television and forcing them to say untruths.



So far, there is no evidence that the audience will find the human evidence presented by Iran more convincing than the machine evidence presented by Britain. But the confrontation appears to highlight at least some of the cultural differences between the technology-based West and the more traditional East.



War By Proxy?



What remains unclear are the precise motives for Iran's Revolutionary Guards seizing the British personnel when they were on a peaceful assignment. The "HMS Cornwall" is part of a task force that operates under UN Security Council authority to catch smugglers in Iraqi waters.



But the seizure comes at a time of high tension between Iran and the West -- and the UN Security Council -- over Iran's nuclear program. It largely coincided with a Security Council vote to expand sanctions against Iran for refusing to halt uranium enrichment.



Protests outside the British Embassy in Tehran on April 1 (Fars)At the same time, Iran is at odds with London and Washington over charges that Iran supplies money and expertise to militants attacking coalition troops in Iraq.



And Iran is angry over the seizure by U.S. forces of five Iranians in northern Iraq in January. Tehran says the five were diplomats but Washington says they were part of a network of Iranian agents helping anticoalition militants.



Whatever the motives for the seizure of the Britons, there are suggestions Iran wants a deal.



Tehran demands a formal apology from London for what it says was trespass into its territory. But U.S. officials have suggested they think larger demands might be in the offing. Washington has already ruled out any exchange of the British naval personnel for the five Iranians taken in Iraq.



The crisis over the British captives has already run longer than a similar showdown in 2004. In June of that year, six British marines and two sailors were seized by Iran in the Shatt Al-Arab waterway.



They were released unharmed three days later after saying they had entered Iranian waters illegally.



Copyright (c) 2007. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036. www.rferl.org

9:42 AM

(0) Comments

Iranian Media Say All British Personnel 'Confessed'

lafrance

,


British marine points to map of Persian Gulf on Iran's Arabic-language Al-Alam TV on April 1

British marine points to map of Persian Gulf on Iran's Arabic-language Al-Alam TV on April 1
(epa)
April 2, 2007 -- After Iranian television showed British naval personnel saying they had entered Iranian territory without permission when they were detained, state-run media say that all 15 being held by Tehran have confessed to illegally entering Iran's waters.

In one part of the footage, two of the Britons point to a map of the Persian Gulf and appear to identify where Iran says their boat allegedly crossed into Iranian waters on March 23, leading to their capture by Iranian naval forces.



One of the sailors, identified as Lieutenant Felix Carmen, said he "can understand why you [the Iranian people] are so angry about our intrusion into your waters."

A spokeswoman for the British Foreign Ministry said it was "unacceptable" for Iran to broadcast video of the captured sailors.


The British government announced on April 1 that it was in direct contact with Iran in an effort to solve the issue of the detained sailors diplomatically.

Britain rejects Iran's allegations that the sailors crossed into Iranian waters, saying the sailors were operating legitimately in Iraqi waters.



(compiled from agency reports)

Copyright (c) 2007. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036. www.rferl.org


10:32 AM

(0) Comments

Britain Calls On Iran To Release Sailors

lafrance

,


British Navy's "HMS Cornwall," where the sailors were based

British Navy's "HMS Cornwall," where the sailors were based (file photo)
(epa)
March 27, 2007 -- Britain has again called on Iran to quickly release the 15 British sailors and marines it has been holding since March 23.

Prime Minister Tony Blair, in an interview on British television, warned that efforts to secure the group's release could enter a "different phase" if diplomatic efforts failed.

"I hope we manage to get [the Iranian government] to realize they have to release them," Blair said. "If not, then this will move into a different phase, but at the moment what we are trying to do is to make sure that that diplomatic initiative works."

Blair's official spokesman, speaking on the customary condition of anonymity, later told reporters the prime minister was not hinting at the possible expulsion of Iranian diplomats or military action.

Iran Questioning Britons

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Mehzi Mostafavi told AP that Iran will decide what to do after determining whether the British group's alleged entry into Iranian waters was "intentional or unintentional."

Hard-liners in Iran want the 15 British sailors and marines charged with espionage and tried. Iran's Islamic Revolution Guards Corps captured the group on March 23 while it was conducting what Britain called an inspection of a merchant vessel near the mouth of the Shatt Al-Arab, at the northern end of the Persian Gulf.

Britain says the sailors and marines were conducting a routine search of shipping near Iran and Iraq's southern border. Iran says they entered Iranian waters illegally.

British, Iraqi Appeals

Meanwhile, British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett has appealed to Iran to allow access to the British sailors and marines to check that they are "in good health."

Speaking in the Turkish capital, Ankara, on March 26, Beckett vowed that Britain will continue to press Iran until the incident is successfully resolved.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Husseini said today that the British personnel are in good health and are being treated humanely, but did not say where the group was being kept.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshiyar Zebari called earlier on Iran to free the British personnel in a telephone call with his Iranian counterpart, Manuchehr Mottaki.

Zebari said the British personnel were detained in Iraqi waters.



(compiled from agency reports)

Copyright (c) 2007. RFE/RL, Inc. Reprinted with the permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036. www.rferl.org